Conservatives, why do you think the profit-driven private interests do a better job than profit?
run interests government in education, health, etc? Do not you remember the excesses of big business over the pollution of our environment (all Superfund sites not come from nowhere), labor exploitation (child labor, excessive hours, discrimination) early last century? Can not see any conflict of interest with the interests of profit-driven health management and education? Can you not imagine the abuses and inequities based on income levels BOOMAN? What is a small government solution to these problems, assuming you do not want the government and supervision, as well? sometimes evading the question. Johnny 2; Thanks for the reply. I understand that the markets in terms of competition, but my question is more about abuse unavoidale that have private control over education and care health. small general government proponents are even against government surveillance. See the problem?
Because private competition companies to find ways to provide more of what people want with fewer resources. In addition, benefits provide a firm (at least temporarily) providing what consumers want, providing a signal to the market and increase the flow of capital to companies that are more effective and efficient use of resources. (That is, People invest more successful companies) However, governments must rely on sources of imperfect information. They usually make their decision based that the lobby can shout louder or increased media coverage. In general, anything that government controls will be carried out unless well with more resources than private enterprise:. Edit Certainly there may be some areas where the control or supervision may be needed from the government. However, currently, the government is far beyond the threshold. And as for the exploitation and abuse of the environment, I think it may be a product of NO BASTA property Private. Think about that kill millions of cows (etc) every year, however, never even come close to extinction. Why? Because private property has been established and is in the best interest of farmers to maintain a stable population level of his flock. Sure you could make money this year by the sacrifice of his flock, but obviously, it would be foolish. Promotes conservation property for the sake of the owners own benefit. Why that private control of health and education to encourage consumption? Competition among health care providers to maintain a level of service that consumers want pay, just as the works of grocery stores. We all have to eat, but supermarkets are not burdon by excessive regulations force them to provide food for certain methods. According to his theory, the lack of government oversight should have been grocery stores selling spoiled food to unsuspecting customers at prices ever increasing. However, in reality, we have seen food prices relatively stable, with the stable and very good quality. This is the result of competition between supermarkets. We see similar results by introducing competition in our educational system, and removing the government imposed limits on the purchase of coverage health insurance among states.